Showing posts with label koolhaas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label koolhaas. Show all posts

16 April 2012

The popularity of an architect

As you may already know, Google NGram Viewer is a tool that enables you to search for keywords in the whole corpus of books digitalized by Google (in 7 different languages), thus indicating the frequency of specific terms over the years. In this TED talk the creators explain the original idea and how they developed the software.
Playing around with NGram I had the idea to look for the importance of some worldwide known architects (i.e. the frequency in which their names appear in books. Of course, we have to infer that cases of homonymy do not influence considerably the results). I considered three architects (R. Koolhaas, P. Eisenman, M. Botta) in the period between 1960 and 2008. I searched first in the English-language body of literature, then in German. Here is what we get:


In English literature Koolhaas, Eisenman and Botta have roughly the same importance in absolute terms. Interest in Eisenman arose around 1970, in Koolhaas some 5 years later and other 5 years later in Botta. It seems that they already experienced their "peak of popularity". In this respect Eisenman and Botta reached it between 1990 and 1995 (I can imagine due to projects such as the Greater Columbus Convention Center and the San Francisco MoMA). Koolhaas, instead, topped between 2000 and 2005, so that we can say he is seen as half a generation ahead (he was born in '44, Eisenman in '32 and Botta in '43).
Let's now have a look at the German corpus:


The graphs have a more homogeneous pattern. Interest in the three architects arose at the same time in the late '70s, and, as with the previous search, they reached their "popularity peak" already, again at the same time roughly, between 1995 and 2000. What is interesting to note is that this time Koolhaas enjoys a popularity 2 times higher that his colleagues...
Now, what about a comparison with the godfathers Le Corbusier and Mies? Here their "behavior" in English:


Their popularity increased steadily roughly until 2000, then the curve became negative. In German, with more variations, the pattern seems comparable:

Here we might speculate about the different impact of media and the star-architect-system, or, in a more radical way, we could imagine a change in the interest architecture and urbanism. Or a growing disinterest? "What ever happened to urbanism?".

27 January 2012

Coney Island

For those of you who enjoyed Rem Koolhaas' depiction of Coney Island in Delirious New York, here you find the amusement in black and white (1940s).

05 November 2011

About Batman and other Chinese characters

"Lonely Planed Mandarin Phrasebook". Image via amazon.com

If you think about China, what comes first to your mind? Which icons represent the Country in our western collective imagination? The "Lonely Planet Mandarin Phrasebook" summarizes our idea of "Chineseness"with: a rickshaw, a bike, taijiquan, the Forbidden City and... Rem Koolhaas' CCTV headquarters. The CCTV building (blessed by fire in 2009) can be considered iconic architecture in one of its purest forms.

Skyscraper-bulimia. Shcreenshot from a R. Koolhaas' presentation.

Skyscraper-pastiche in the Shanghai Urban Planning Museum. Image by jesabele

In fact, China (not differently from Dubai) seems now very fond of iconic buildings, collecting patchwork- or collage-skylines. As one can easily imagine, the results are often both interesting and dreadful. In Shanghai some examples of this skyscraper-bulimia can be: "the Batman", "the Chinese pot", "the bottle-opener" and "the upside-down duck" (a sort of Venturian reinterpretation).

|■|
"The Batman". Image by Ol.v!er [H2vPk]

Shanghai Art Museum
"The Chinese pot". Image by iferneinez

Shanghai_2011 05 30_102
"The bottleopener". Image by HBarrison

The Urban Planning Museum
"The upside-down" duck. Image by Augapfel

The "venturian" big duck. Via wikipedia.org

10 February 2009

Koolhaas + Fire = Skycrap

Photo by Diametrik

Rem Koolhaas has never been so happy. Neither the dutch architect could have imagined a skyscraper flamboyant in Beijing; far beyond imagination. What chinese media tried to hide was a very interesting iconic performance.
If we take Rem Koolhaas and we add fire, a very special medium (what a blessing), here is the result: a "skycrap".